Texas Is Killing Its $5.5 Billion Hemp Market — While Handing Medical Licenses to Trulieve and Cresco

Behind the counter of Austinite Cannabis Co., the family-owned shop where she does 60 percent of her revenue in hemp-derived THC, Estella Castro is doing the survival math for the third time in two years. First came Senate Bill 3, the total ban that passed the Legislature in 2025 before the governor's veto saved her. Then came the state health department's proposed fees — $20,000 per retail location, a roughly 10,000 percent increase she told regulators "would force me to close despite doing everything right." Now the author of the original ban has promised to file it again in January, and a court ruling has put a July 31 deadline on the products that fill most of her shelves. "I feel like we're better than that, you know, we're Texas," she says. "We need to find some middle ground." (S3, S6)

Texas is running the American cannabis argument in both directions at once. The state is moving — by court ruling, by agency rule, and if Senator Charles Perry has his way, by statute — to dismantle a hemp-derived THC market estimated at $5.5 billion a year, more than 9,100 licensed sellers and tens of thousands of jobs. In the same twelve months, it has licensed twelve new medical cannabis dispensers, welcomed Trulieve, Cresco and Green Thumb into the state, and added chronic pain to the qualifying conditions of a program that, until now, served a sliver of Texans through exactly three providers. One market is being strangled while its replacement is still under construction. (S1, S2, S5, S9, S10, S11)

The ban's newest vehicle was announced July 7, at a Senate Health and Human Services interim hearing that chairwoman Lois Kolkhorst opened by admitting, "I've probably never gone into a hearing that I'm more nervous about." The testimony was one-directional and grim: 10,515 THC exposure calls to the Texas Poison Center Network, the largest group involving children five and under; pediatric cannabis overdose visits at one Baylor Scott & White children's hospital more than quadrupling since 2021. Perry, the Lubbock Republican who wrote the vetoed SB 3, closed the loop: "The taxpayer is going to stop funding at a minimum next session." He will re-file a total ban when the Legislature convenes in January 2027. (S1, S2)

He may not need to win the vote. On May 1, the Texas Supreme Court reversed the injunction that had kept delta-8 THC legal since 2021, ruling the state health department may treat manufactured delta-8 as a Schedule I substance. "If the legislature desires to legalize powerful drugs, it has every tool it needs to do so — and to do so unmistakably," Justice Evan Young wrote. On July 10, the department reinstated its 2021 cannabinoid definitions in the Texas Register, effective July 31 — a stroke that outlaws most non-delta-9 hemp THC products regardless of what the 2027 Legislature does. "If you're a business or consumer, this impacts products that do not have delta-9 in any amount," warned Lukas Gilkey of Hometown Hero, the Austin company whose lawsuit had held the line for five years. A separate Travis County injunction still blocks the state's March rules — the industry's last legal shield, and a partial one. (S12, S13, S14)

The prohibition drive has been a three-year Republican civil war. Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick made the ban his signature fight — "I'm not going to legalize marijuana in Texas... if people want to vote me out of office for that, so be it" — and pushed SB 3 through both chambers, only to watch Governor Greg Abbott veto it in June 2025. Two special sessions deadlocked. Abbott answered instead with an executive order: 21-and-up sales, ID checks, testing and labeling standards. The backlash to the ban came from Patrick's own side — veterans' groups, small-business conservatives, talk-radio hosts — and it is why lawmakers like Democrat Nathan Johnson predict the House "won't go with it again." Perry is betting a year of poison-center data changes that. (S2, S7, S8)

“I feel like we're better than that, you know, we're Texas. We need to find some middle ground where it's not a complete ban, and we can still be able to come together.”

— Estella Castro, Owner, Austinite Cannabis Co., Austin

The fight has produced scenes no one would have scripted for Texas Republican politics. Patrick, defending the ban at a Capitol press conference, threw a bag of THC edibles at a reporter to make a point about packaging that mimics candy. Conservative radio host Dana Loesch fired back at the whole enterprise: "This is stupid. It's like the gun ban argument with a different variable... do your job as a parent and parent instead of idiotically expanding government." Patrick — running for reelection with a Trump endorsement and more than $33 million banked — has made clear he considers the political risk acceptable. Veterans' groups, who rely on hemp THC in a state whose medical program only now covers chronic pain, have been the ban's most sympathetic opponents. (S7)

While the hemp market fights for its life, the state's official cannabis program is staffing up. House Bill 46, signed the day before the SB 3 veto, expanded the Compassionate Use Program from 3 dispensing licenses to 15, added chronic pain, traumatic brain injury, Crohn's disease and hospice care to the qualifying conditions, and allowed satellite locations. The Department of Public Safety has since awarded all twelve new licenses — to a roster that reads like the national industry's index: Trulieve, Verano, PharmaCann, Green Thumb's RISE, Cresco. All twelve remain conditional, not yet cleared to sell; only the three original providers are operating. Trulieve is furthest along, targeting September openings in Austin, Dallas and San Antonio. (S9, S10, S11, S4)

The two stories are not independent, and the industry knows it. Texas's medical operators stand to inherit whatever demand a hemp ban displaces — a point trade coverage has made explicitly — which complicates every framing of the medical expansion as a neutral policy good. The hemp side's economics deserve their own scrutiny: the $5.5 billion and 53,300-job figures come from a Whitney Economics report commissioned by the hemp industry itself. And the child-safety numbers driving Perry's bill are real, whatever one thinks of his remedy. The Texas Hemp Business Council's Cynthia Cabrera called the July hearing "a travesty of the legislative process" for excluding legal businesses; her council's own position — regulate, restrict to 21-plus, don't ban — is closer to Abbott's executive order than to either extreme. (S1, S5, S14, S15)

1. July 31 — the health department's reinstated cannabinoid definitions take effect; how aggressively the state enforces against delta-8 sellers is the first test.
2. The Travis County injunction — the hemp council's lawsuit is the last barrier holding back the March rules; its collapse would finish what the Supreme Court started.
3. November 2026 — the separate federal hemp-product ban takes effect, potentially mooting parts of the Texas fight.
4. January 2027 — Perry's re-filed ban meets the same House, and possibly the same veto pen, that killed it twice.
5. September — Trulieve's first three Texas medical dispensaries target opening.

Castro's middle ground is, at this point, the loneliest position in Texas cannabis: too regulated for the prohibitionists, too permissive for the Senate, and squeezed on the calendar from both ends — a state ban arriving July 31 and a federal one in November. "Banning it is just hurting the consumer," she says. The consumers will decide that at the register — either at the 9,100 hemp counters Texas built by accident, or the 15 medical ones it is building on purpose. (S3, S6)

Keep Reading

Policy & Compliance

Nine People Weighed In. Then Wyoming Told the Trump Administration No on Cannabis.

Attorney General Keith Kautz — a 71-year-old retired state supreme court justice — used a 30-day trigger statute, one sparsely attended hearing and a two-page decision to make Wyoming the first state to formally refuse federal rescheduling. South Carolina read the same kind of law and reached the opposite conclusion.

By Cannabis Inc, Editorial Staff·7 min read

Policy & Compliance

122 Signatures Stand Between Massachusetts and the First Repeal of a Legal Cannabis Market

The prohibitionists' petition cleared its last threshold on July 9 by the thinnest margin in memory — and a Dorchester cannabis advocate had already filed to disqualify exactly that many names. The state's $1.65 billion adult-use market now rides on a commission ruling and a November 3 vote.

By Cannabis Inc, Editorial Staff·7 min read